BothSides

← All issues

National

Military recruiting

Is military recruiting at historic highs, and who deserves the credit?

Information checked against its sources on October 26, 2026.

First drafted by Claude, an AI model. Edited and reviewed for balance by Leonard Dalenberg. How this site is written

Side A

Yes. A real turnaround under new leadership.

Supporters of the administration say recruiting has gone from crisis to success in two years, and that leadership and a renewed sense of patriotism made the difference.

  • Every service met its goal. In fiscal 2025 all five active services reached their targets, averaging 103 percent, and the Pentagon called it the best record in more than a decade.
  • And again, early. In fiscal 2026 all five had met their goals by July, months before the year ended.
  • From worst to best. The Navy fell almost 20 percent short in 2023; in 2025 it reached 108.6 percent of its goal.
  • A faster pipeline. Officials credit shorter medical-screening waits and preparatory courses that help near-qualified applicants meet standards.

On this view the results speak for themselves: the services are signing up more than they asked for, two years running.

Side B

Strong, but not historic, and the credit is shared.

Critics accept that recruiting has recovered, but say “historic” overstates it, and that much of the recovery has causes no single administration controls.

  • The rebound started earlier. The Army beat its 55,000 goal in fiscal 2024, under the previous administration.
  • The goals are smaller. The services sought about 159,000 recruits in 2025, against 292,021 in 1989. The Army's 2025 goal was 61,000; in 2005 it was 80,000.
  • Other forces at work. Large pay raises, preparatory courses begun in the previous administration, and a cooling job market all push young people toward enlisting.
  • Not every part met. The Army Reserve reached only 75 percent of its 2025 goal.

On this view recruiting is healthy, but presidents tend to claim the good years and blame the economy for the bad ones.

Other views

The record, term by term

Active-duty recruiting, by fiscal year (October to September), so years do not line up exactly with terms. “No misses found” means none was reported in the sources below.

TermWhat happened
G.H.W. Bush, 1989–93All goals met; 100–101 percent each year during the post–Cold War drawdown.1
Clinton, 1993–97All goals met; 100–101 percent each year.1
Clinton, 1997–2001Missed in 1998 (Army and Navy; 97 percent overall) and 1999 (Army and Air Force; 96 percent), the first misses since 1979. 100 percent in 2000.1
G.W. Bush, 2001–05101 percent in 2001; no misses found for 2002–04.1,2
G.W. Bush, 2005–09Army missed in 2005: about 73,000 of 80,000, its worst year in more than 25 years.3
Obama, 2009–13No misses found.2,4
Obama, 2013–17No misses found.2,4
Trump, 2017–21Army missed in 2018: about 70,000 of 76,500, its first miss since 2005, though the most it had signed since 2010.4
Biden, 2021–252022: Army missed by 25 percent. 2023: Army 55,000 of 65,000; Navy 30,236 of 37,700; Air Force 24,100 of 26,877, its first miss since 1999. 2024: rebound; the Army beat its 55,000 goal.5,6,7
Trump, 2025–2025: every active service met its goal, averaging 103 percent. 2026: all five met their goals by July, 103 percent combined.8,9

Factual review

What is established

  • Fiscal 2025. Army 62,050 of 61,000 (101.7 percent); Navy 44,096 of 40,600 (108.6); Air Force 30,166 of 30,100 (100.2); Space Force 819 of 796 (102.9); Marine Corps 26,600 of 26,600 (100). The Army Reserve reached 75 percent. Fiscal 2025 began on October 1, 2024, under the previous administration.8
  • Fiscal 2026. The Army met its 61,000 goal in May, the Air Force and Space Force in April and the Navy its 45,000 goal in June; the Marine Corps met its 26,600 goal.9
  • The scale then and now. Defense-wide goals fell from 292,021 in 1989 to 174,806 in 1995. From 1989 to 2001 the services usually reached 100 or 101 percent of their goals.1
  • Pay. The fiscal 2025 raise was 4.5 percent across the board, with another 10 percent for junior enlisted troops; fiscal 2026 added 3.8 percent.9
  • Demographics. Lower birth rates after the Great Recession mean about 10 percent fewer young people turning 18, beginning in 2026.7

What is disputed

  • Who deserves the credit? The administration credits leadership and patriotism. Recruiting officials told reporters the causes are mixed and hard to separate, and include a softening civilian job market.9
  • Is it “historic”? Measured against goals, 103 percent is above the 100–101 percent of 1989–2001. Measured in recruits, today's numbers are far below those years, because the military is much smaller.1,8
  • Are standards holding? A Defense Department inspector general found the Army and Navy undercounted recruits with low aptitude scores, by counting scores earned after preparatory courses rather than at sign-up.8

Where it comes down to values

  • Credit and blame. How much should a president be credited or blamed for results driven partly by the economy?
  • Numbers or quality. Is it better to meet every goal, or to hold the line on standards and accept a shortfall, as the Army said it did in 2018?
  • How big a force. Should the country aim for a larger military, which would raise goals and make them harder to meet?

Sources

  1. Congressional Research Service, “Recruiting and Retention in the Active Component Military: Are There Problems?” RL31297, Feb. 2002 (Department of Defense figures, FY1975–2001). everycrsreport.com
  2. Thomas W. Spoehr, “The Administration and Congress Must Act Now to Counter the Worsening Military Recruiting Crisis,” Heritage Foundation, July 28, 2022. heritage.org
  3. Salon, on Associated Press figures, Sept. 30, 2005. salon.com
  4. Stars and Stripes, “Army misses 2018 recruiting goal, which hasn't happened since 2005,” Sept. 2018. stripes.com
  5. Military.com, “Big Bonuses, Relaxed Policies, New Slogan: None of It Saved the Military from a Recruiting Crisis in 2023,” Oct. 13, 2023. military.com
  6. Army Times, “Army hits recruiting target for the first time in 2 years,” Sept. 26, 2024. armytimes.com
  7. Hoover Institution, “Military Recruiting Shortfalls—A Recurring Challenge,” Jan. 28, 2025. hoover.org
  8. Military Times, “Military recruiting off to ‘strong start’ for fiscal 2026, DOD says,” Dec. 22, 2025. militarytimes.com
  9. Military.com, “The Military Branches Hit Their 2026 Recruiting Goals Months Early,” Aug. 11, 2026. military.com

← All issues

Reader comments

No comments yet. Respond to either side, add a view the page missed, or challenge a fact with a source.

Commenting is open to account holders. Accounts are approved by the editor, and comments appear under your real name.